Indico is back online after maintenance on Tuesday, April 30, 2024.
Please visit Jefferson Lab Event Policies and Guidance before planning your next event:

May 8 – 12, 2023
Norfolk Waterside Marriott
US/Eastern timezone

Framework for custom event sample augmentations for ATLAS analysis data

May 11, 2023, 2:00 PM
Hampton Roads Ballroom VI (Norfolk Waterside Marriott)

Hampton Roads Ballroom VI

Norfolk Waterside Marriott

235 East Main Street Norfolk, VA 23510
Oral Track 3 - Offline Computing Track 3 - Offline Computing


van Gemmeren, Peter (Argonne National Laboratory)


For HEP event processing, data is typically stored in column-wise synchronized containers, such as most prominently ROOT’s TTree, which have been used for several decades to store by now over 1 exabyte. These containers can combine row-wise association capabilities needed by most HEP event processing frameworks (e.g. Athena for ATLAS) with column-wise storage, which typically results in better compression and more efficient support for many analysis use-cases.
One disadvantage is that these containers, TTree in the HEP use-case, require to contain the same attributes for each entry/row (representing events), which can make extending the list of attributes very costly in storage, even if those are only required for a small subsample of events.
Since the initial design, the ATLAS software framework features powerful navigational infrastructure to allow storing custom data extensions for subsample of events in separate, but synchronized containers. This allows adding event augmentations to ATLAS standard data products (such as DAOD-PHYS or PHYSLITE) avoiding duplication of those core data products, while limiting their size increase. For this functionality, the framework does not rely on any associations made by the I/O technology (i.e. ROOT), however it supports TTree friends and builds the associated index to allow for analysis outside of the ATLAS framework.
A prototype based on the Long-Lived Particle search is implemented and preliminary results with this prototype will be presented. At this point, augmented data are stored within the same file as the core data. Storing them in separate files will be investigated in future, as this could provide more flexibility, e.g. certain sites may only want a subset of several augmentations or augmentations can be archived to disk once their analysis is complete.

Consider for long presentation Yes

Primary authors

Mete, Alaettin Serhan (Argonne National Laboratory (US)) Burzynski, Jackson Carl (Simon Fraser University (CA)) Catmore, James (Unoversity of Oslo (NO)) Heinrich, Lukas (Max-Planck-Institut f\"ur Physik) Nowak, Marcin (Brookhaven National Laboratory (US)) Krumnack, Nils (Iowa State University (US)) van Gemmeren, Peter (Argonne National Laboratory)

Presentation materials

Peer reviewing