Indico is back online after maintenance on Tuesday, April 30, 2024.
Please visit Jefferson Lab Event Policies and Guidance before planning your next event: https://www.jlab.org/conference_planning.

Sep 12 – 15, 2017
CEBAF Center
US/Eastern timezone

Electronic structure probed with positronium: Theoretical viewpoint

Sep 14, 2017, 1:25 PM
25m
Room F113 (CEBAF Center)

Room F113

CEBAF Center

Jefferson Lab 12000 Jefferson Avenue Newport News, VA 23606
Oral Contribution Positron Applications Plenary 11

Speaker

Jan Kuriplach (Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic)

Description

Positronium can be very helpful when studying the electronic structure of materials. Indeed, the recent experiment [1], where the Ps emission from a copper (110) surface was examined, allowed for the precise determination of the electron chemical potential of copper by means of measuring the Ps affinity. This affinity ($A_{Ps}$) [1] is defined formally via the electron ($\Phi_-$) and positron ($\Phi_+$) work functions as $A_{Ps} = \Phi_- + \Phi_+ - E_{Ps}$, with $E_{Ps}$ ($\doteq$ 6.803 eV) being the Ps ground state binding energy. In the Ps emission experiment, the maximum kinetic energy ($E_K$) of emitted Ps atoms is measured via the Ps time of flight. Since $E_K = -A_{Ps}$, the Ps affinity can be determined. Alternatively, $\Phi_- + \Phi_+$ can be represented via the sum of the electron and positron chemical potentials, which can be obtained using density functional theory for electrons and positrons. The Ps affinity is, therefore, a bulk property. When the accurate correlation functional for positrons [2] is employed, one can check various possibilities for the electron exchange-correlation (XC) functional and compare the resulting electron chemical potential with that deduced from the Ps affinity. Such a procedure was shown to work for Cu [1] where we could find the proper XC functional with a precision of order 10 meV. In this contribution, we investigate computationally other materials, which are expected to show interesting features in their electronic structure like 2D or 3D Dirac cones and Weyl points (half-metals), and check whether the Ps affinity is a negative number so that Ps atoms may escape materials surfaces, allowing thus for the precise measurement of $A_{Ps}$. Several XC functionals are tested for electrons, including the recently introduced meta-generalized-gradient approximation [3]. As for materials, we examine the Heusler alloy/compound Co$_2$MnAl, topological insulator Bi$_2$Se$_3$, and Dirac metal candidate Zr$_2$Te$_2$P. In addition, we inspect the Na$_3$Bi system exhibiting several topological features in its electronic structure; Na$_3$Bi is further considered as a Na-ion battery (anode) material [4]. The possibility of studying the electronic structure of high-entropy alloys via the Ps emission is also discussed. A working positron beam is a necessary condition – but by far not the only one – to perform such experiments. Spin-polarized positron beams may bring further research possibilities (e.g. for spintronics). In this respect, we discuss approaches to the spin-polarized theory of electron-positron correlations [5]. [1] A.C.L. Jones et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 216402 (2016). [2] B. Barbiellini and J. Kuriplach, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 147401 (2015). [3] J. Sun et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 036402 (2015). [4] J. Sottmann et al., Chem. Mater. 28, 2750 (2016). [5] H. Li et al., J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 27, 246001 (2015).

Primary author

Jan Kuriplach (Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic)

Co-author

Dr Bernardo Barbiellini (Department of Physics, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA)

Presentation materials